<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Social Marketing Diva - Latest Comments</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#forumcomments-7b72a61c" type="application/json"/><link>http://socialmarketingdiva.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://socialmarketingdiva.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 22:16:56 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Who are those ‘People You May Know’ in LinkedIn’s suggested connections?</title><link>http://www.thesocialmarketingdiva.com/2012/04/who-are-those-people-you-may-know-in-linkedins-suggested-connections/#comment-526932256</link><description>&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I have to say this post was certainly informative and&lt;br&gt;contains useful content for enthusiastic visitors. I will definitely bookmark&lt;br&gt;this blog for future reference and further viewing. Thanks a bunch for sharing&lt;br&gt;this with us!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://onesourcerestoration.com/services/contractor-services" rel="nofollow"&gt;for&lt;br&gt;the terms&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jason Morgan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 22:16:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who are those ‘People You May Know’ in LinkedIn’s suggested connections?</title><link>http://www.thesocialmarketingdiva.com/2012/04/who-are-those-people-you-may-know-in-linkedins-suggested-connections/#comment-494725571</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My favorite part is when they show my profile to exes who then send me connection requests. Lovely!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Miss Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:52:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Marketing Training &amp;#8211; Beyond Tips and Insights</title><link>http://www.thesocialmarketingdiva.com/2011/12/facebook-marketing-training-beyond-tips-and-insights/#comment-385471495</link><description>&lt;p&gt;  I agree with you that facebook has become a leading and effective &lt;br&gt;source of social media marketing and it is playing vital rule to promote&lt;br&gt; your brands on web therefore, there is more need to make your social &lt;br&gt;media campaign perfect and useful.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">web development services</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 04:33:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Key Elements for a Successful Home Page</title><link>http://www.thesocialmarketingdiva.com/2011/10/key-elements-for-successful-home-page/#comment-384833988</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great article Katheryn. Everything you need and nothing you don't. Interesting that our attention span is down to 3-5 seconds. I feel for the next generations. With technological advancements, their span will be measured in nanoseconds. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brian</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 11:02:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Resonate With Your Market</title><link>http://www.thesocialmarketingdiva.com/2011/07/resonate-with-your-market/#comment-298621251</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good day The Social Marketing Diva,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I’m looking for any contact details (email, phone number or mail address) of the website owner or marketing person that I can communicate with for possible business venture on website income opportunities. We are very much interested to do business with you. Please send me an email together with your website name and I’ll be glad to call you to discuss this matter.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thank you&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Save your Precious Files now to TheDataLocker Online Backup! Checkout &lt;a href="http://www.thedatalocker.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.thedatalocker.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Glenn</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 08:22:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Resonate With Your Market</title><link>http://www.thesocialmarketingdiva.com/2011/07/resonate-with-your-market/#comment-266182789</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You are welcome, Nancy.  You wrote a fabulous book and more importantly, made an amazing discovery about the nature of presentations that make a difference in people's lives.  Thank you for that!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kagorges</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 02:13:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Resonate With Your Market</title><link>http://www.thesocialmarketingdiva.com/2011/07/resonate-with-your-market/#comment-266056001</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Kathryn!  I appreciate your compliments. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nancy Duarte</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 21:34:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Eric Schmidt, ex-CEO of Google has it all wrong: Google vs. Facebook</title><link>http://www.thesocialmarketingdiva.com/2011/06/eric-schmidt-ex-ceo-of-google-has-it-all-wrong-google-vs-facebook/#comment-256622740</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Hoka,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks for your comment.  I don't believe I've missed the point of Google's long game -- I understand they want to understand so they can predict and interpret our intent.  My point is that their approach is not one based on relationship, but one based on analysis of our actions independent of others.  And I think they're excellent at that and not so good at relationship building.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And now we'll see if I'm wrong -- as we watch and participate in the new phenomena of Google+ -- and I'm happy to be wrong, I just don't think I am...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Warmly,&lt;br&gt;Kathryn&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kagorges</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 19:29:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Eric Schmidt, ex-CEO of Google has it all wrong: Google vs. Facebook</title><link>http://www.thesocialmarketingdiva.com/2011/06/eric-schmidt-ex-ceo-of-google-has-it-all-wrong-google-vs-facebook/#comment-242258196</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You've missed the point of Google's long game entirely.  They want a greater understanding of us as people so they can predict intent and unturned serve us better results.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A prime example of why search results need to be tailored to us is where an expert is searching for some details about a topic and a someone who is only after a description of the experts trade. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hoka</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 18:21:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Eric Schmidt, ex-CEO of Google has it all wrong: Google vs. Facebook</title><link>http://www.thesocialmarketingdiva.com/2011/06/eric-schmidt-ex-ceo-of-google-has-it-all-wrong-google-vs-facebook/#comment-216526785</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Jim,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I agree with your advice that 'social engineering' isn't perhaps the best terminology -- I think I'll change that in the post as well since I had no intention of casting a negative slant.  Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Regarding Google needing the social graph to create context -- I also agree they need to integrate the social actions we take to serve up ever more relevant results.  However, I still think they aren't going to be able to create the social graph that accurately reflects that.  They'll need to leverage off of something that's already doing a good job -- either Facebook or some newcomer that's willing to partner.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think that even with a partner, if Google has the upper hand there will be a problem with their 'personality' dominating the social platform.  Facebook has the freedom to create and explore the social graph tools, not limited by creating a particular result for a company like Google.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;No mistakes have been made, which is what Eric Schmidt is saying.  Google has a strength and it's not social, but they need social to continue to excel.  And that's their challenge!  If I were running the company I'd do it differently -- I would respect my own in house expertise and I'd respect the expertise of a potential partner and I'd form a peer relationship to the advantage of all.  And I wouldn't try to influence their social graph activities very much -- acknowledging that it's not my area of expertise.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kagorges</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 11:36:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Eric Schmidt, ex-CEO of Google has it all wrong: Google vs. Facebook</title><link>http://www.thesocialmarketingdiva.com/2011/06/eric-schmidt-ex-ceo-of-google-has-it-all-wrong-google-vs-facebook/#comment-216500420</link><description>&lt;p&gt;However well meaning, I don't think Google will take your advice and here is why I think they shouldn't:  Google's stated mission is to  “...organize the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful.”  The amount of information that Google has organized and can make almost instantly accessible to us is enormous and ever expanding. In order for that volume of information to be "useful" requires context.  The more context, the more useful.  So when you search for weather, Google gives you local weather based on what they know via your IP address (or mobile device) about your location.  Access to our social graph is important to Google in a number of ways. They do not need to become Facebook but they need to have access to the kind of data that Facebook or Twitter or LinkedIn has: our so called "social graph" and our identity.  With this information (given with our permission) they can return search results even more useful.&lt;br&gt;One other point:  calling Facebook a "social engineering" company is not very nice.  I don't think you meant it this way but the term "social engineering"  is more commonly associated with fraud or trickery.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jim Coffis</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 10:48:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Eric Schmidt, ex-CEO of Google has it all wrong: Google vs. Facebook</title><link>http://www.thesocialmarketingdiva.com/2011/06/eric-schmidt-ex-ceo-of-google-has-it-all-wrong-google-vs-facebook/#comment-216267391</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You have a point, Kathy.  Google's algorithm will only get better when they get beyond themselves and integrate some crowdsourcing as in the +1's they have now.  I still believe that Google has more to offer through their incredibly deep stable of engineers -- stuff we haven't even thought of yet and it's only going to be social because another company takes it and applies it in a social context.  Google is not going to become social.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kagorges</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 23:55:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Eric Schmidt, ex-CEO of Google has it all wrong: Google vs. Facebook</title><link>http://www.thesocialmarketingdiva.com/2011/06/eric-schmidt-ex-ceo-of-google-has-it-all-wrong-google-vs-facebook/#comment-216263006</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well said, Kathryn. However, I will add this. Google so far has been fighting a losing battle against black hat SEOs and affiliate marketers who continually find ways to lead them astray in their attempt to only return the most relevant results. That's because it's not that hard to outwit algorithms. Algorithms are, after all, always predictable. (I know that will start an argument, but let's not go there.:) &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So what's a Google to do? I say stop relying solely on algorithms and mathematical formulas to give us what we want. Instead, let people tell us what is relevant. People are, after all, smarter, less predictable, and less likely to be fooled.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And this is where social comes in with the Shares, the Likes, the Tweets, the bookmarks, and now Google's +1's. We as people can now tell Google what is relevant, what is smart, what is liked, and what is trash. And I think Google is smart in acknowledging that. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So, while I agree with you in that I think Google should not try to become another social site, I'm happy to see that they are becoming bedfellows with them. What they do best -- which is return the articles of interest we are seeking -- will only get better as a result. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kathy Long</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 23:47:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Optimize the time you spend on social media marketing</title><link>http://www.thesocialmarketingdiva.com/2010/06/optimize-the-time-you-spend-on-social-media-marketing/#comment-134101656</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree... when you share a piece of yourself, no matter how dull you think it is, people are interested.  Just watch reality TV for 10 minutes and you'll see how the world is tuning in to normal mundane life, but people like to connect with real people.  Sames goes with social media connections. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Big Brother Live Feed</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 20:06:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What is a Social Marketing Diva? And why does it matter?</title><link>http://www.thesocialmarketingdiva.com/?p=5#comment-30079108</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi very nice articles&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">saravanakumarc5</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 04:44:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What is a Social Marketing Diva? And why does it matter?</title><link>http://www.thesocialmarketingdiva.com/?p=5#comment-30079096</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice article ,thanks&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">saravanakumarc5</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 04:44:18 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
